Sunday, March 04, 2007
Wes Clark's belated bean-spilling
Not a huge fan of Clark, but this little tidbit is as scarifying as it might have been useful to know 5 years ago.
Why is it that these people--disgruntled military brass and cabinet members--have to wait until it's too late to do anything about a situation--or in Gerry Ford's case, until after they're dead--before they speak out or leak anything of substance? Decorum shouldn't trump national loyalty, but it always does.
Why is it that these people--disgruntled military brass and cabinet members--have to wait until it's too late to do anything about a situation--or in Gerry Ford's case, until after they're dead--before they speak out or leak anything of substance? Decorum shouldn't trump national loyalty, but it always does.
About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.” I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.” He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?” He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” -- meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office -- “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”
posted by Evil Ed, 8:30 PM
6 comments
6 Comments:
clark is like mel gibson in that movie "conspiracy theory" - someone needs to put him on meds. if that memo was real, then why havent we even bombed syria yet? you should promote this kind of trash, paranoid cyberblog blabber blubber. shame on you and hilary clinton!
To the preceding cockbite...
You misspelled Captain America.
Hmm. What makes me reluctant to believe this is the remark about 7countries...
Who would draft a plan discussing invading 7countries one after the other??
Deluded neoCons or not-- acomplishing something like that would be impossible and I'm sure even they realized it.
Hmm. That's what makes me question the underlying claim.
You misspelled Captain America.
Hmm. What makes me reluctant to believe this is the remark about 7countries...
Who would draft a plan discussing invading 7countries one after the other??
Deluded neoCons or not-- acomplishing something like that would be impossible and I'm sure even they realized it.
Hmm. That's what makes me question the underlying claim.
alpha factor, you misspelled captin america. it's a proper name. you don't spell fallon fallen, do you? hmmmmm?
This isn't much related to Wes Clark...
But I really want the Beast-tribesmen to check this out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByLqJD36F7E&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmissdynamite%2Ecom%2Fblog%2F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxt9TUteMt8&mode=related&search=
The 2007 Cockbite Political Action Conference. Incidentally, within the first 60seconds, you'll meet a good candidate for a future Loathesome List.
But I really want the Beast-tribesmen to check this out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByLqJD36F7E&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmissdynamite%2Ecom%2Fblog%2F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxt9TUteMt8&mode=related&search=
The 2007 Cockbite Political Action Conference. Incidentally, within the first 60seconds, you'll meet a good candidate for a future Loathesome List.
interesting point - I was up to this moment a potential Wes Clark fan, for the reason that he wants to do something to put the brakes on an apparent campaign to attack Iran militarily or initiate a quasi-war, and quasi-wars don't really exist except as a vehicle to circumvent all kinds of nasty anti-war laws and things like congress, the American public, etc.
this is the sort of thing you hear a lot and can't really verify, but there IS a plan, if you can call it that, a "plan" in the sense of "vision" backed by certain uncoordinated actions and other coordinated actions, to try and make the Middle East "Western-friendly" and "Israel-friendly" by undercutting the Enemy of the Day, nation by nation, as fluid circumstances dictate.
All countries in the region that have substantial Muslim populations are on the X-list. Yesterday, Saddam was Evil Incarnate. Two days before yesterday, he was a Friend, a Secular Helper against the Evil Religious Iran.
But that doesn't mean that this memo is an actual plan or makes any sense, or that if someone actually wrote this as a plan, that it could conceivably be implemented. I do believe there are some with influence on the administration who might actually have such a "vision", but what actually goes down is never visionary, and nobody really knows what will happen, not even Stephen Hawking.
I'll park my enthusiasm for Wes Clark in one of those freshly sprouted universes, parallel to Obama's universe.
thinkbridge.blogspot.com
this is the sort of thing you hear a lot and can't really verify, but there IS a plan, if you can call it that, a "plan" in the sense of "vision" backed by certain uncoordinated actions and other coordinated actions, to try and make the Middle East "Western-friendly" and "Israel-friendly" by undercutting the Enemy of the Day, nation by nation, as fluid circumstances dictate.
All countries in the region that have substantial Muslim populations are on the X-list. Yesterday, Saddam was Evil Incarnate. Two days before yesterday, he was a Friend, a Secular Helper against the Evil Religious Iran.
But that doesn't mean that this memo is an actual plan or makes any sense, or that if someone actually wrote this as a plan, that it could conceivably be implemented. I do believe there are some with influence on the administration who might actually have such a "vision", but what actually goes down is never visionary, and nobody really knows what will happen, not even Stephen Hawking.
I'll park my enthusiasm for Wes Clark in one of those freshly sprouted universes, parallel to Obama's universe.
thinkbridge.blogspot.com
I am unsure if the authenticity of the memo is real or not but I do know the facts and the facts are that we Cheney did have Wolfowitz write a document in 1992 that discussed the future of our world. This has evolved into the Project for a New American Century, which is a think tank for our government today. Also we did have 4 planes turn around in the middle of a bust day one after another hitting building one of which was the Pentagon, during a coincidental war game that Cheney just happened to be in charge of. I think we do have unanswered questions that need further inquiry. Did you know that the investigation for Clintons blow job cost something like 20 times more than… the investigation of 911!
, at 4/02/2007 8:22 PM



